Skip to main content

Zale Corp

Long-time excellent stock picker Jim Garvin noticed this today and passed it along:

Hi Gene, This morning Goldman Sachs highlighted Zale as a "source of opportunity". They recommend that their clients short the stock, and put a target of $18. The reasoning: "...growing macro headwinds, management upheaval, and poor strategic positioning will likely pressure earnings." I've never shorted a stock in my life, but I found this interesting and wanted to pass it on.

I had noticed the downdraft in the stock, but hadn't seen the Goldman analyst report.

(Chart).

I've got a lot to say about this. The Zale board and CEO should have been gone long ago. Apparently they announced that they are looking for a COO. Well, they had an excellent COO - Sue Gove, who knew the business inside and out - and they threw her out about three years ago or so on accounting concerns - which proved to be completely unfounded. As far as I know, they never apologized to Sue after their review showed that there weren't any issues tied to her.

Zale has been up and down since the hostile takeover 20 years ago - when Jim and I worked there. It was one of the last hurrahs for Milken and Drexel Burnham - with tiny People's Jewelers acquiring Zale. At the time, Zale had a strong vertical integration, and leadership positions in Europe - all of which got unwound after the takeover. The company eventually went bankrupt under the failing leadership from Peoples - and languished for years in bankruptcy. It has been a revolving door of CEO's since - I would guess average tenures of less than four years - not long enough to learn the intricacies of a more complicated industry than apparent.

So, let me make a rescue proposal to anyone on the board paying attention: Don Zale, who's family name still adorns most of the doors, is still there in Dallas - bring him back as Chairman - and beg Sue Gove to come back and stop the bleeding...

Jim, Sue and Donald, you are all welcome to comment.

(In edit: Jim - I'm surprised you've never shorted - this is a great time to play on the dark side...)

Comments

Jim Garvin said…
This morning I saw the news that Zale has made a deal to sell Bailey, Banks & Biddle to Finlay for $200,000,000. The price equates to about 70% of annual sales, or 8.7 times EBITDA. I think that is a good strategic move as it will narrow the focus and should enable Zale to get rid of a ton of headquarters expense.
9:34 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...
10 comments
Read more

No Steve No

To:Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer: Please, please don't spend my money on Yahoo. Spend $4 billion per year for the next 10 years building something new and better. This has to now be an ego deal, not an economic deal. If you withdraw the bid, YHOO is a $15 stock. You are too smart for this. Many times the best deals are the ones you don't make. This is one of those times. Don't spend my money on this. Sincerely, gene
1 comment
Read more

I Want My GM Stock

It isn't clear how many shares of General Motors will be issued. I've nosed around, but can't find anything definite. However, the general indication is that the U.S. government (that is, us) will own 60% post bankruptcy. I want my piece immediately. And I want you to get yours to. According to the IRS website, about 156 million tax returns were filed for 2008. So, let's do this: 156 million multiplied by five equals 780 million shares. So, distribute five shares to everyone whot filed a return. After all, we taxpayers are going to be paying for this mess for years to come. Sure, there will be some very predictable whining that the government can't get repaid like that, or the cost to GM of keeping records and sending annual reports to all those independent shareholders is too great a cost. Well, I don't give a damn about that. The bad management and greedy unions that got GM into this mess could have foreseen the problem and they didn't. Tough noogies. I wa...
6 comments
Read more