Skip to main content

High-level Comparison of Amazon vs. Wal-Mart


This is a high-level and admittedly simplistic comparison of 2012 financial performance of $AMZN versus $WMT.  Full disclosure: I own $WMT and have for a long time.  I don’t own $AMZN.
The numbers are from each company’s earnings release (linked below).   All ratios are calculated from GAAP amounts.

Sales: WMT $469.2 bil; +5.0%; an increase of $22.2 bil; AMZN $61.1 bil; +27.1%; an increase of $13.0 bil.  EBIT and EBIT margin: WMT $27.8 bil; 5.92%;  AMZN $0.7 bil; 1.1%. Net income: WMT $17.0 bil +11.1%; AMZN $(0.39) bil. Negative -NM;  ROE: WMT 21.6%; AMZN (0.5)%. (ROE was calculated using two-point average equity: beginning and end of year.)
EPS and growth: WMT $5.02 +11.1%; AMZN $(0.09) Negative - NM.

PE using trailing EPS and Feb. 23 closing prices: WMT 14.0; AMZN NA.   Market cap to Sales: WMT .50X, AMZN 1.97X.
I’m a regular shopper of both firms, frequenting Sam’s Club and Wal-Mart, and ordering regularly from Amazon.  I love Amazon’s smooth and helpful website.  And I’m increasingly unhappy with the length of checkout lines in both Sam’s and WalMart  (anybody from Bentonville reading this?) but that doesn’t mean I understand the investor infatuation with Amazon.  The theory apparently is that, at some date in the future, Amazon will expand its margin.  And then there will be earnings for investors.  But then does their business still work?  Shipping individual boxes to homes can never be as efficient as shipping truckloads to stores and having consumers drive to the store.  So margin expansion comes from pricing, not from be more efficient than WMT. And if they raise prices, then doesn’t their advantage go away?

 At the dawn of the Internet age, in a meeting in 1999, Boston Consulting Group consultants and Internet business CEOs told me that AMZN was clearly worth more than WMT.  Further, WMT’s growth was over.  Since then WMT has added $331 billion in revenue.  Oh, and WMT pays a dividend.
I didn’t get the valuation difference then, and I don’t get it now.  Although I would really like it if Wal-Mart traded at the Amazon price-to-sales ratio….

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=97664&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1779040&highlight=

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

No Steve No

To:Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer: Please, please don't spend my money on Yahoo. Spend $4 billion per year for the next 10 years building something new and better. This has to now be an ego deal, not an economic deal. If you withdraw the bid, YHOO is a $15 stock. You are too smart for this. Many times the best deals are the ones you don't make. This is one of those times. Don't spend my money on this. Sincerely, gene

So Who Wins?

Every recession plants the seeds for economic advantage in the future recovery. In the very tough 1973-1974 recession, prices fell so low that it enabled the creation of the leveraged buyout industry. With many manufacturing companies in particular trading at 3-4 times cash flow, new market entrants like KKR, Forstmann Little and Dyson Kisner Moran came in and created gigantic wealth for themselves and early investors. In the 1991-1992 downturn, engendered in part by the massive office space overbuilding funded by Savings and Loans (Resolution Trust Co, anyone?) made it possible for telcom and internet start-ups in Austin, San Jose, Northern VA, Boston's Route 128, Dallas, etc. to rent offices at a fraction of the cost had those communities not been overbuilt. And the 2001-02 downturn gave us cheap fiber and bandwidth, and bargain-priced software to feed productivity gains in corporations everywhere. So, where is the upside? At this moment, all that I can project with some confid...