Skip to main content

A Must Read for Anyone Over Fifty

The Wisdom of Crowds
The Wisdom of Crowds (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

There are an increasing number of books that provide insight into how our minds work.  Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Coleman and The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki are two good examples.  Daniel Kahneman, in Thinking Fast and Slow, picks up that theme and advances it by an order of magnitude.  In my view, this is the must read book of the year, and absolutely required read for anyone over fifty.

Each knows that there are parts of our brain that toil away ceaselessly regulating breathing and blood pressure, managing digestion and keeping our heart beating on schedule without us being consciously aware of it.  From other books like Emotional Intelligence, we know that there is also a high-speed circuit that responds to stimulus far faster than conscious thinking.  There are numerous examples.  Touch something hot with your hand and you’ll move it before you actually feel the pain.  See someone you know in a busy airport or train station?  Not only will you recognize them instantly, you’ll know if they are sad or angry – our brains are hard-wired with high-speed circuits for facial recognition.

Mr. Kahneman, through a series of examples, tests, incorporation of original research and reports of research from others, informs us that our autonomous brain does far more, including a lot of things that we should be doing with our conscious thoughtful brain, but we don’t.   He uses the term System 1 for the autonomous function and System 2 for our thoughtful, conscious brain.  System 1 is fast, intuitive and emotional.  System 2 is slower, more deliberative and more logical.  Read the book and you’ll know that System 1 is doing a lot of stuff.  Most is either critical and performed well, or performed poorly but unimportant, but a certain part is done because of laziness or a concentration failure on our part, and would be much better managed by System 2.

The first few chapters are reasonably easy read and full of interesting little quizzes.  You’ll probably answer some of those quizzes wrong, and it will be because you let rapid-fire System 1 come up with the answer instead of deliberating with System 2.  One of these tests (I won’t give it away) was given to a class at Princeton, conceivably some of the best and brightest in the country, and a majority of them failed, so don’t feel too bad if you fail it also.

However, I must warn you that the content gets harder.  I’m reasonably literate in at least basic statistics, and I found myself challenged a number of times.  On more than one occasion, I didn’t understand the answer even when Kahneman gave it to me.

After proving to us that we let System 1 interfere when it shouldn’t, Kahneman provides chapters on our various thinking and logic errors and guidance on what to be on guard for to make sure we put System 2 in charge, and we prevent the vast number of thinking shortcuts that lead to suboptimal decisions. There are chapters on how a tired and overloaded brain makes bad decisions.  How we tend to be poor assessors of risk, overly concerned about low probability events and not sufficiently concerned about riskier activities.  This extends into how humans make investment decisions.  I found the chapter on “Anchoring”, that is, how we attach value to a reference number, even if we shouldn’t, particularly useful, and very valuable when approaching a negotiation.  There is thoughtful, research-based advice on when to rely on an “expert” and when not.  I am going to debate one example with Dr. Kahneman in the chapter on Regression to the Mean.  A key point of the chapter is to be thoughtful and thorough when analyzing data with significant outliers, with generally the more reliable guide is to assume a trend regressing to the mean.  I have to agree.  However, he uses an example of building a sales budget for a group of department stores, with the question of how to allocate a planned 10% total sales increase to the individual units.  It is a four unit chain, with sales history ranging from $11 million for the lowest performing store to $29 million for the best.  There is very little other information.  Kahneman’s conclusion is that more than 10% should be planned for the lowest performing units and less to the highest.  Dr. Kahneman, I totally reject that conclusion.  I’ve been an executive and an investor in a number of retail businesses.  If anything, I would allocate all of the sales increase to the better performers.  There are specific reasons why one location has sales that are more than double that of the worst performer.  It is in a better shopping center.  Or located on a street with higher traffic, or in a town with a vibrant, growing economy while the worst performer is the opposite – bad market, bad location, weak shopping center, etc.  Equally importantly, what is portrayed as four data points – e.g. annual sales, really isn’t.  Assuming these stores are opened at least six days a week, it is the result of hundreds of days of sales.  Depending upon the average item price (say five dollars, or fifty dollars or five hundred dollars) and the number of items an individual purchases at a time, this is the result of thousands or hundreds of thousands of transactions.  It is the sum of a very large number of transactions.  But to argue over one example in a very large book is clearly to quibble.

Why do I say that this is a must read for anyone over fifty?  Let’s face it.  Once we’ve crossed that line – maybe fifty for some of us, sixty or even seventy for others, we simply don’t think as fast.  Do you watch the famous game show Jeopardy?  Generally I can hold my own with many contestants.  I know a lot of the answers.  However, I also know that I can no longer come up with those answers fast enough.  The contestants buzz in way too fast for me.  There is research on the ability of us in our second fifty years to make wise investments.  It turns out that not too many of us are Warren Buffet.  We need to be cautious and thoughtful when putting our money to work.  This book provides very valuable insight into our unconsciously lazy mental habits and equally unconscious thinking errors.  It is a must-read.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: What Matters Now by Gary Hamel

Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the MLab dinner tonight. Google's Marissa Mayer and Hal Varian also joined the open dialog about Google's culture and management style, from chaos to arrogance. The video just went up on YouTube. It's quite entertaining. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Cover of The Future of Management My list of must-read business writers continues to expand.   Gary Hamel , however, author of What Matters Now , with the very long subtitle of How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation , has been on the list for quite some time.   Continuing his thesis on the need for a new approach to management introduced in his prior book The Future of Management , Hamel calls for a complete rethinking of how enterprises are run. Fundamental to his recommendation is that the practice of management is ossified in a command and control system that is now generations old and needs to be replaced with somethi...

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step. Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008. Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred. So, Mitt may be drawi...