Skip to main content

Book Review: What Matters Now by Gary Hamel

Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the...
Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the MLab dinner tonight. Google's Marissa Mayer and Hal Varian also joined the open dialog about Google's culture and management style, from chaos to arrogance. The video just went up on YouTube. It's quite entertaining. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Cover of "The Future of Management"
Cover of The Future of Management
My list of must-read business writers continues to expand.  Gary Hamel, however, author of What Matters Now, with the very long subtitle of How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation, has been on the list for quite some time.  Continuing his thesis on the need for a new approach to management introduced in his prior book The Future of Management, Hamel calls for a complete rethinking of how enterprises are run.

Fundamental to his recommendation is that the practice of management is ossified in a command and control system that is now generations old and needs to be replaced with something that reflects an educated workforce, globalized demand and supply, the Internet and networks in general, and the incorporation of technology into everything.
Further, he also calls for a new era of ethics in business, lamenting the failure of banks and investment banks to monitor themselves, and being in the center of the causes of the Great Recession.  His indictment of business behavior really leads to my only criticism of the book.  The first 35 pages are devoted to recounting the recent problems.  Since I lived through all that, and watched it, I didn’t need detailed reminders of the questions about Complexity, Leverage, Illiquidity, Deceit, Hubris (all paragraph headers) etc., that were part of the near-collapse of the U.S. economy from far too much debt at every level.

He moves to a background review. In summary he believes that enterprises are largely managed with techniques from the turn of the last century, designed when most factory workers were poorly educated, with multiple layers of supervisors, managers, senior managers, etc., etc. with some kind of a standard ratio of one to ten or so, that creates giant management overheads.  Those overheads, perhaps once necessary in a mass production era with a less educated workforce and little information technology,  in his view, now slow decisions, impede innovation, and restrict senior executives from a real understanding of what is happening at the customer/product level.
That’s what he wants to dramatically change.  The balance of the book is devoted to approaches and examples of companies on the edge of radically different structures (e.g. W.L. Gore, Morning Star) that are making self-directed teams, smaller business units, and innovation from the bottom, work to create faster, more nimble, more responsive – and profitable businesses.

He proposes that leaders think of five areas where an overhaul is needed: Values, Innovation, Adaptability, Passion and Ideology.  His argument is that today’s global competition, and pace of change driven by technology combined with a new generation of workers who want something more than just a paycheck, means that to succeed, companies must (a) welcome ideas and innovation coming from every part and level of the enterprise, (b) scrap traditional control systems that really don’t work anyway (e.g. presumably there were plenty of traditional control systems in place that failed to prevent the sub-prime mortgage crisis) while stifling the business, (c) engage employees in such a way that they commit to higher effectiveness, and infuse the organization with values that lead to the right moral and ethical decisions without energy-sapping control systems.

It is a good challenge for managers to contemplate.  I’ll admit to struggling to see how some of my prior employers could evolve into a Morning Star, with self-directed workers and virtually no managers.  But it remains thought-provoking.
He concludes with a list of twenty-five “moonshot” ideas, that is, bold big ideas for leaders to consider.  While most readers will have seen some of these, they probably have not seen all of them, and certainly not all in one place.  I continue to rate Hamel as a must-read for business executives and exec –wannabes.  This is no exception.  Recommended.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hello! I'm at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone 3gs!
Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to
all your posts! Keep up the great work!

my web blog; Polaris Ranger Parts

Popular posts from this blog

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step. Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008. Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred. So, Mitt may be drawi...