Skip to main content

Tragedy at Sandy Hook

I’m sad.
I had some other ideas I wanted to write about today, but they no longer seem relevant to anything.  As a father and grandfather, I cannot imagine what those families are going through.

It is incomprehensible.
My Twitter feed is replete with comments on gun control.  While I’m a gun owner, I would support a ban on automatics.  But I think there is something deeper and more difficult going on.  Guns have always been plentiful in the U.S.  In the neighborhood I grew up in, every family I knew well owned guns.  Most of the fathers were WWII vets.  They would go small game hunting, duck hunting, and occasionally deer hunting. 

There were no incidents of mass slaughter.  No one took one of their father’s guns and murdered fellow students.
What’s changed?  Why does this happen now, but didn’t happen in the fifties and sixties?  One answer would be everything.  Single parents were rare in my working-class neighborhood, but common now.  Class started with The Lord’s Prayer, The Pledge of Allegiance, and a Bible reading.  Corporal punishment was administered.  We learned not to tell our parents we had been spanked at school, because we would get a worse spanking at home for embarrassing the family.

Would going back to any of that matter?  I don’t know.
I have my personal pet hypothesis.  But I have no data.  I think the incredibly violent video games have made a difference.

I would like to know if the two boys in Columbine, the Virginia Tech Student, the White Supremacist in Wisconsin, the kid in Montgomery County PA who, thankfully, was turned in before he could attack, the guy at the mall in Portland, the man in Lancaster PA, played violent video games a lot.
Now I understand that millions play these games and don’t go berserk.  Just like hundreds of millions drink, but only a percentage become alcoholics.  But we restrict access to alcohol for that, and some other reasons.

I’d just like to know.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: What Matters Now by Gary Hamel

Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the MLab dinner tonight. Google's Marissa Mayer and Hal Varian also joined the open dialog about Google's culture and management style, from chaos to arrogance. The video just went up on YouTube. It's quite entertaining. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Cover of The Future of Management My list of must-read business writers continues to expand.   Gary Hamel , however, author of What Matters Now , with the very long subtitle of How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation , has been on the list for quite some time.   Continuing his thesis on the need for a new approach to management introduced in his prior book The Future of Management , Hamel calls for a complete rethinking of how enterprises are run. Fundamental to his recommendation is that the practice of management is ossified in a command and control system that is now generations old and needs to be replaced with somethi...

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step. Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008. Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred. So, Mitt may be drawi...