Skip to main content

Will Working Puzzles and Playing Strategy Games Preserve Your Brain?

If you do it right, puzzles and games might just save your brain.
There are millions of players of strategy games, memory games, word games and puzzles. They want to know that working crosswords, solving sudoku, playing bridge, mahjong or chess will help preserve mental acuity. Some are counting on it.

Cognitive Reserve
Cognitive reserve is the term developed after researchers found instances of examination of the brains of individuals that showed signs of dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, but, while alive, the individual had exhibited no signs of dementia.  We want to build cognitive reserve, and there is evidence that puzzles can do that. One key-and positive-study from 2011 found that solving crossword puzzles delayed onset of memory loss by 2.5 years, and may have had much longer beneficial impact.
NIH Research
The National Institute of Health and the National Institute of Nursing Research funded a study on brain-training and cognition. That study is related-admittedly indirectly-to our question of games, puzzles and brain health. In that study, 2,800 volunteers underwent different kinds of brain training. One group did memory training like recalling words from a list. Another did reasoning work, such as identifying patterns, finding the next item in a series and so on. The third did speed-of-processing drills, such as identifying objects on a computer screen shown for increasingly shorter periods. The study followed up on participants’ capabilities at regular intervals. At ten years, those who had been in the reasoning group or the speed of processing group still outperformed a control group.
Since the participants weren’t actually playing games or solving puzzles, I won’t argue that it is direct proof. But training on reasoning and pattern-spotting is akin to many games and puzzles. Here’s how it would work on the brain: solving puzzles or winning a game causes the brain to produce dopamine. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter-that is, it transmits signals between neurons. Dopamine pathways play a role in reward behavior, and dopamine is associated with cognition, movement, pleasure and attention. Increases in dopamine may help motivate us to move, achieve goals and find work rewarding. Therefore, producing more dopamine would, in turn, cause us to do more (healthy) things.
And We Know Loneliness Is a Killer
In previous posts, I’ve covered some of the research on the physical damage that loneliness and isolation does to the brain, and the importance of involvement with friends and family to brain health.
Traditional strategy games like chess, checkers, and go require two players. And there are thousands of games from the ancient such as dominoes and mahjong to classics like Life, Monopoly and charades. Further, there are new ones created every year. Most of those games require four or more players. Playing strategy games like chess and Six Making, which we offer, require planning and reasoning. So do card games like bridge and poker. Games like mahjong can be played just for fun, or very seriously. The result of playing those games is more (healthy again) social interaction.
My Conclusion
If playing a game is the principal reason someone makes regular connections with friends, then games are indeed beneficial to brain health. And if the fun part is combined with serious concentration six moves ahead in Go, or remembering if the ten of hearts has been played, the evidence leans to being good for building that bigger brain.

www.bigbrain.place offers fun stuff that is good for your brain

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: What Matters Now by Gary Hamel

Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the MLab dinner tonight. Google's Marissa Mayer and Hal Varian also joined the open dialog about Google's culture and management style, from chaos to arrogance. The video just went up on YouTube. It's quite entertaining. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Cover of The Future of Management My list of must-read business writers continues to expand.   Gary Hamel , however, author of What Matters Now , with the very long subtitle of How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation , has been on the list for quite some time.   Continuing his thesis on the need for a new approach to management introduced in his prior book The Future of Management , Hamel calls for a complete rethinking of how enterprises are run. Fundamental to his recommendation is that the practice of management is ossified in a command and control system that is now generations old and needs to be replaced with somethi...

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step. Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008. Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred. So, Mitt may be drawi...