Skip to main content

On The Brink by Hank Paulson

Just completed Henry "Hank" Paulson's On The Brink, his account of the financial crisis, the origins of the recession, and his actions as Treasury Secretary. There are two popular books on this topic,: this one and Andrew Ross Sorkin's Too Big To Fail. In this review I'll concentrate on Paulson's. When I write the review on Sorkin's, I'll make some comparisons.
While I followed the financial crisis closely and had strong opinions of what the appropriate government responses were, this book clearly illuminated much more. In both the popular media and the blogosphere, one can find many criticisms of the various programs undertaken by the government to attempt to stem the tide of financial failure that was sweeping through the market. I would speculate that the majority of that criticism comes from conservatives, which is unfortunate. The information seems overwhelming to me that the country barely escaped a second depression. Find any account of the bank failures in the 1930's as they grew from a trickle to a wealth-destroying roaring river, and the parallels are clear. in the thirties, the savings of farmers, individuals, and millionaires alike were destroyed as bank after bank succumbed to "runs". The same thing was well underway in 2007 and 2008, as hundreds of local banks failed, along with much larger IndyMac Bank, Countrywide, and then Bear Stearns and Lehman. We can speculate on which institution would have been next (Morgan Stanley, Wachovia and Merrill Lynch were likely candidates) but action prevented it.
Paulson tells all this in a straightforward style. He provides the inside the beltway view that would be difficult for others, as he recounts discussions with President Bush, who found the required actions completely opposite to his conservative beliefs, with Congressional Committee Chairmen and senior members, and with the various other Executive Branch and Fed officials.
He provides some personal background as well, and as I read the book, I'll admit to being pleasantly surprised to learn how many multi-millionaire investment bankers, like Paulson, grew up in modest circumstances.
There were surprises in those stories. Barney Frank comes off as a total stand-up guy, willing to take the heat. George Bush too, prepared to take on members of his own party who wanted a free-market outcome. Nancy Pelosi shows up as smart, political, and politically savvy. Barrack Obama is smart, informed, helpful until election day, and then unwilling to aid until sworn in. Chris Dodd flip-flops, and John McCain is made out to be a grandstander, who never understood how bad a crisis the country faced. In the private sector, Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase, when push came to shove, was always prepared to do the right thing for the country.
In turn the explanation of the development of TARP, TALF, the monitoring of the markets as each day brought forth more calamity (The signal for me was when the Reserve Fund - one of the oldest, largest and most successful "broke the buck". If money funds devalued, the country would have faced another wave of value destruction the size of the equity elimination of residential real estate. Here again, Paulson recounts what was required to get politicians on board, to face the crisis, and take action. I've long felt that few of our elected officials have any understanding of the economy and market system; this book is and unhappy confirmation of that.
By itself, the play-by-play account of the weekend where Treasury and The Fed tried to come up with a way to save Lehman and prevent deepening crisis is worth the purchase price of the book.
Whether the government did the right thing or not will be the subject of analysis and argument for decades. For those of you who believe TARP, TALF, etc, were huge mistakes, before I cal l you an idiot, I urge you to read this book. If you still think that after reading it, you ARE an idiot.
At the end, Paulson gives his view of what kind of reform is required to regulate giant, multinational financial institutions. I guess in a few years we'll know how close the just past "FINREG" act comes to that.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Anonymous said…
Good post and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Gratefulness you seeking your information.

Popular posts from this blog

The Reasons We Think America is On the Wrong Course

I was listening to the Michael Medved show yesterday. He does a nice job at talk radio. But he was worked up because the CBS News Poll showed that 72% of Americans surveyed think the U.S. is on the wrong track. (When I went to CBS' site, it looks to me like the number is 69%, but that's an insignicant difference). Medved's view is that income for the poorest citizens are rising (recent government data), unemployment is low, stock market is high, no cold war, so why so pessimistic? Here are my answers: Several of our young men and women are being killed every day in a war that we are getting sick of. The deficit is some unimaginable, staggering number that my generation is imposing on my children. Social Security is bankrupt and both Congress and the Administration (both previous and current, and both Republican and Democratic) are unwilling to face the issue. There are virulent infectious agents in hospitals that are resistent to essentially all antibiotics, and the drug co...

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step. Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008. Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred. So, Mitt may be drawi...