Skip to main content

Home Alone Wasn't Just Bad For Macaulay Culkin

What everyone ought to know about loneliness.




Isolation and Loneliness Can Be Deadly
From the UCLA Healthy Years Newsletter:
Prolonged loneliness and isolation can have serious effects on your health. It can increase bouts of Depression and sadness, disrupt sleep, elevate blood pressure and raise levels of the stress hormone cortisol.
Research has shown that extreme loneliness can increase your chances of early death by 14 percent. In fact, loneliness is put in the same risk category as smoking 15 cigarettes a day, and has twice the impact on premature death as does obesity.

The University College London (UCL) and Manchester University have been conducting an ongoing multi-year study called ELSA -English Longitudinal Study of Aging. They reported this finding:
                Social isolation was associated with poor scores on all measures of cognitive function.

John Cacioppo is a psychologist and neuroscientist. He has been studying the effects of loneliness and social isolation for over twenty years, most recently as a Professor and Director, Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience at the University of Chicago. In an interview in The Guardian, he noted:
When you allow for all the other factors, you find that chronic loneliness increases the odds of an early death by 20%.
For one thing, we found that loneliness decreases the effectiveness of sleep. You have sleep fragmentation and you always wake up tired. The cumulative wear and tear is greater if you lonely than if you are not. You cannot make a direct line to heart disease or cancer, but you can certainly see the effects on the immune system.[1]

A Cure: Friendships
Angela Troyer, the program director of neuropsychology and cognitive health at Baycrest Hospital in Toronto, Nicole Anderson, Associate Professor of Psychiatry & Psychology at the University of Toronto and Kelly Murphy PhD, Clinical Neuropsychologist at Baycrest wrote Living with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Guide to Maximizing Brain Health and Reducing Risk of Dementia. 

In a PsychologyToday article, Professor Troyer wrote: “Did you know that connecting with friends may also boost your brain health and lower your risk of dementia?” She went on to make these four points about social interaction: you may live longer, you will enjoy better physical health; you will enjoy better mental health; and you may even lower your risk of dementia.

In Anderson, Murphy and Troyer’s work, they’ve determined that getting out and doing stuff with friends results in a stronger immune system, and reduces the risk of depression. Further, those interactions are associated with better memory and cognition, or, the construction of the important brain attribute “cognitive reserve”. Cognitive reserve seems to help our mental capability as we age.

Your Brain Wants You to Hang Out and Do Stuff With Your Friends
My late father was a member of a church-based group called “The ROMEOS”. Yes, that really was the name of the group. And yes, it was church-based. ROMEO is an abbreviation of “Retired Old Men Eating Out”. Once a week, they went to a restaurant. It forced older men to get up, moving, and out with friends. At that point in his life, he could no longer drive and my mother, his wife and companion for over sixty years, had passed. He looked forward to that weekly encounter.

The implications are rather clear: it isn’t just important to have close friends, it is essential to good health. Go to church. Some sources recommend volunteering as a way to meet new people and develop new relationships. Attend lectures at the library. Meet a friend at Starbucks. Set a schedule to call a family member every week. Play board and strategy games - they require you to be social. And a good game of chess, mahjong, or go will tax your brain (in the healthy way) too.

www.BigBrainPlace.com offers fun stuff that happens to be good for your brain.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: What Matters Now by Gary Hamel

Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the MLab dinner tonight. Google's Marissa Mayer and Hal Varian also joined the open dialog about Google's culture and management style, from chaos to arrogance. The video just went up on YouTube. It's quite entertaining. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Cover of The Future of Management My list of must-read business writers continues to expand.   Gary Hamel , however, author of What Matters Now , with the very long subtitle of How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation , has been on the list for quite some time.   Continuing his thesis on the need for a new approach to management introduced in his prior book The Future of Management , Hamel calls for a complete rethinking of how enterprises are run. Fundamental to his recommendation is that the practice of management is ossified in a command and control system that is now generations old and needs to be replaced with somethi...

Stimulus Plan

Mr. President: The House stimulus bill is awful. Dangerous. Counter-productive. It has a very high probability of making things worse!. Your man Rahm Emanuel is supposed to be a tough guy: turn him loose on the House Dems - they are selling you down the river. Some simple tests: the spending will improve long-term productivity; the spending will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and the spending will happen fast; very, very fast. There may need to be some legislation to enable spending without years of environmental review. For example, spending on wind farms would improve long-run productivity and reduce dependence on foreign oil. But let's say the wind farm is a couple of miles offshore. You can't have environmental groups stopping the development to see if some fish will be harmed. This spending has to happen now. And, no tax cuts with the possible exception of AMT. People aren't going to spend any tax savings; they are going to pay their credit card bills or r...

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step. Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008. Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred. So, Mitt may be drawi...