Skip to main content

Romney/Thompson dream ticket?

The role of Fred Thompson in yesterday's SC primary is as murky as his next step.

Did he divide the religious vote and thereby hand Huckabee a loss? Or would those votes, had he not been there, have gone elsewhere? My instinct is that more of those votes would have gone to Romney or McCain than to Huckabee. Fred comes across to me as the thinking person's conservative: thoughtful on positions, a sense of history, a Federalist, serious about the war on terror and prepared to take the long view on it. His addresses have content, not sound bites - which may, unfortunately, be a drawback in 2008.

Mitt is quickly seizing the stage as the most knowledgeable in the field on economics, growth and job creation. With a war still consuming dozens of billions, it isn't clear that the race will be won on voters' views of candidates job creation prowess. However, he gives off as much energy as Fred seems to absorb - Mitt's electron shell could power Fred.

So, Mitt may be drawing professional class, Fred the fiscal conservatives and those concerned about immigration, as well as being acceptable to the religious voters.

Assume that I'm right for a moment, i.e. that most of Thompson's supporters would have otherwise gone to Mitt - then it would have been a tight three person race (despite Sunday morning talking heads commentary to the contrary, McCain didn't crush Huckabee).

Given that Thompson hasn't won a race, and funds must be running tight, could a Romney/Thompson ticket be crafted? Thompson as the Cheney for Romney - the insider who knows the beaucracy, the key players, the staffers, potential cabinet members and so on? Even though I don't believe anyone ever votes for the VP, parties nonetheless look for "balance" - e.g. Northern and Southern candidates, or East and West. This would be a Northern Governor and a Southern Senator...

I don't know that their egos would allow it, and I doubt that Mitt would want to tie himself down early, but both need something going into Florida and Super Tuesday.....

Comments

James said…
A Romney/Thompson ticket is very unlikely because Thompson wants his friend McCain to win the nomination. A more likely combination is McCain/Huckabee. Huckabee will be the kingmaker by throwing his support to McCain. McCain has to have the lower middle class Republican voters to win the nomination, and they're behind Huckabee. Huckabee would be proud to be on McCain's ticket. Because of his stand on immigration, the only way McCain gets that vote is with Huckabee on the ticket. Both McCain and Huckabee are unpopular with the 40% of Republicans who think George Bush has been a good President, but in the end, they want to win the general election. The only way Romney wins the general election is if Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee.
Steve V said…
From a Democrats perspective anything with Romney/Insert Name Here would be a wet dream of historic proportions. The GOP Dukasis, one can only hope!
Steve S said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Steve S said…
Romney doesn't need Thompson to compete for the nomination. He is already ahead in total votes won and in delegate count. McCain is the guy who needs to name a VP running mate. He would be the oldest president in US history and with his type-A personality and age it is highly unlikely that he will complete 8 years in office. (Remember all the talk about whether Reagan was too old to be president? McCain is even older). Americans deserve to know now who they might be supporting to run their government if McCain is elected. But Thompson would be a bad choice. Imagine having two senators with no executive experience in the most important administrative position in the world.
gene said…
McCain/Huckabee is an interesting combo and does deal with the age issue and social conservatives....but if the race becomes Huckabee vs. Clinton I'm going to have a hard look at Bloomberg...

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: What Matters Now by Gary Hamel

Interview of Eric Schmidt by Gary Hamel at the MLab dinner tonight. Google's Marissa Mayer and Hal Varian also joined the open dialog about Google's culture and management style, from chaos to arrogance. The video just went up on YouTube. It's quite entertaining. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Cover of The Future of ManagementMy list of must-read business writers continues to expand.Gary Hamel, however, author of What Matters Now, with the very long subtitle of How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation, has been on the list for quite some time.Continuing his thesis on the need for a new approach to management introduced in his prior book The Future of Management, Hamel calls for a complete rethinking of how enterprises are run.

Fundamental to his recommendation is that the practice of management is ossified in a command and control system that is now generations old and needs to be replaced with something that reflects an educat…
As happens this time of year, publishers list their most important/influential/etc. youngsters.  As an example, the May issue of Wired has “20 Unsung Geniuses”.  We think mature adults deserve recognition just as much as 20-something billionaires.  Here is our Sixty Over Sixty list of the most influential, annoying, important or folks we just find interesting.  Here then, sorted by age, is The Sixty Most Important Leaders Over Sixty.
Henry Kissinger.  Still the U.S. best thinker on foreign policy and diplomacy. His recently published book (at age 91) World Order is not only a best seller, it is extraorinary. Jimmy Carter.  Better as an ex-President than President.  His work for Habitat for Humanity is a lesson for all of us. T. Boone Pickens.  Oilman, energy expert.  Creator of The Pickens Plan for energy independence. Frank Gehry.  Showing the world what new materials and CAD design can do to architecture. Warren Bufett. Best investor in history.  Becoming one of the best philanthro…

The Acceleration of Asset Lite Business Models

The number of asset lite businesses is steadily increasing, as is the breadth of industries effected.  I first noticed them in the 1970’s, when Baron Hilton sold several flagship Hilton hotels while retaining management contracts that entitled Hilton Corporation to a share of revenue and earnings. Over the next two decades, Marriott Corp copied and then perfected the hotel management agreement business approach, coupling a Marriott franchise with a management agreement for any one of a growing stable of brands (Fairfield Inns, Courtyard by Marriott, Residence Inns, J.W. Marriott, etc. etc.), enabling absentee investor/owners.  It turns out, however, that asset lite business structures date back much earlier.
Franchises and Dealers Early versions of asset lite businesses include franchise and dealer organizations. Soft drink and beer distributors, auto dealers and tire and repair franchises date to the early nineteen hundreds, as manufacturers needed mass distribution. The dealers furn…